The next ‘next Billy Graham’


Every time a preacher gains national prominence someone applies the tag of “the next Billy Graham.” In my memory, it was Southern Baptist-turned-Pentecostal TV preacher James Robison whom I first heard identified in that way — but there have been others.

The Economist has a story giving that title to Rick Warren, who ably queried the two presidential candidates last night in a “civil forum.”

I liked both the title of the event and Warren’s introductory statement: “We’ve got to learn to disagree without demonizing one another.” My guess is that Warren has seen enough of the other approach in both the American political arena as well as his own Baptist world.

Though with deep respect for the aging evangelist, identifying the frumpy and creative Southern California preacher as “The next Billy Graham” is unnecessary and inapplicable in many ways.

No one is going to fill Billy Graham’s shoes — not because his stature is so great (and it is) but because the world has changed so much. The religious diversity of America, the sense of a smaller world and the demise of stadium evangelism are just a few reasons.

Neither T.D. Jakes, Joel Osteen, offspring Franklin Graham on any other is going to take up where the elder Graham left off.

Yet, in a sense, Warren is a more likely candidate to assume Graham’s pastoral role on the national scene. His blend of conservative theology and social compassion has wide appeal.

Unlike so many prominent preachers, Warren attracts persons from a wide range of backgrounds rather than repelling those unlike him with arrogant condemnation. It was encouraging to watch a Baptist leader listen to the presidential candidates last night rather than dictating to them the ideologies that must be embraced in order to get his and his followers’ support.

So often, so-called Christian leaders (including several Baptists) appear in the national media only to embarrass many of us. Yet, Warren — with his compassionate heart, broad world view and genuine warmth — did not.

No wonder both candidates consider him to be a friend who treats them fairly even at points of disagreement. Civility may make a comeback after all.

Also Warren is honest with the viewing audience. Unlike the personalities of the waning religious right, he does not praise one candidate as being God’s choice and caution against the fall of the nation if the other is elected and THEN state: “However, I do not endorse candidates for office.”

After weeks of negative political ads and ridiculous proclamations by pundits, a serious, civil conversation felt good on a Saturday night. Even the absence of neckties seemed to help those involved in presidential politics to relax a little.

I also liked the way Warren called them “John” and “Barack” — not out of disrespect for two U.S. Senators but as an embrace of their humanity. Whoever wins the November election, it seems likely he will have Warren’s number in his cell phone.

Influence should be won rather than coerced. Warren’s civil approach to political debate and deep commitment to tackling the toughest challenges facing the world (AIDS, human trafficking, conflicts, poverty, etc.) give him a platform for participation in the political arena.

The next Billy Graham? No, it seems that being the current Rick Warren is just fine.

2 Comments

  1. John:
    I have a couple of responses to your Rick Warren blog here.
    The first is my comment August 19 on your sister site bl.com on Rick Warren:

    by Stephen Fox on Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:42 am

    http://www.ethicsdaily.com/article_detail.cfm?AID=10898

    For once I agree with Jonathan on one aspect of this event. I don’t think Criswell and Pressler were on the Grassy Knoll outside the motorcade coaching McCain on Warren’s questions as they were being asked of Obama

    On the other hand I have to take some nuanced reservations with my friend John Pierce’s Blog on Rick Warren and Billy Graham I think all of you will want to read .

    Melissa Rogers blog is distinct from Pierce; but neither pursues the Roland Martin fairly heated exchange with Dobson’s Tony Perkins before the forum on CNN Sat night.
    Richard Land was on pbs newshour last night.I linked that transcript in the Advice to Obama thread here on this board.
    Roland Martin has a challenge for him and Richard Jackson and McCain’s pastor Yeary with his Martin’s challenge to Perkins.
    Martin’s challenge to Perkins; that is what I hope John Pierce and Melissa Rogers and Bob Allen will take up in the aftermath of this Rick Warren event; and I hope they will find a venue like PBS Newshour to Press Richard Land on the point who came away relatively unchallenged last night on PBS Newshour, Land’s History and Heritage in Rovian Politics.

    I may come back with some thoughts on Billy Graham and Warren later.
    I think both are good guys, but I persist in thinking Marshall Frady is necessary thoughtful reading for anyone who would hold forth on Graham; and the crashcourse would be about 10 mintues at your local Barnes and Noble or a good library and the first four pages of the Chapter Purity in Rick Perlstein’s recent book Nixonland.
    Or a good conversation with Randall Balmer, Charles Kimball and Charles Marsh on Graham’s political legacy.
    Even so, I think Warren had a deserved place at the table of our national discussion Sat Night.
    Hope the conversation continues in Progressive Baptist Life between the likes of yourself, Melissa Rogers and Gushee; as I’m sure it will.

  2. Seems to me the evidence of Warren and his church’s obvious Republican leaning (scheming?) in the Forum now disqualifies him from an august title such as the “next Billy Graham.”

    Then again, given Billy’s rather unabashed “baptism” of such notables as the conniving Johnson, a Next Billy doesn’t necessarily have to be either neutral or fair, does he?

    Siding in politics always turns the Bride of Christ into something more like the Whore of Babylon. No one should desire to replicate Graham’s poor choice of political entanglements.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This